Psychology ETDs
Publication Date
6-3-1966
Abstract
Many recent studies of the effects of past-experience variables on perception have organized in the effort to provide tests of the enrichment and differentiation accounts of these effects. The enrichment position. Usually stated in terms of acquired distinctiveness of cues (Goss, 1955; Miller and Dollard, 1941), holds that learning a distinctive responses to a stimulus will result in the addition to that stimulus of a distinctive response-produced cue. In turn, the newly “enriched” stimulus is less similar to related stimuli than before such learning occurred. Moreover, this reduction in similarity is conceptualized as a reduction in generalization among the list of enriched stimuli. Accordingly, this reduction in stimulus generalization provides a condition under which enriched stimuli may enter into association with discriminative motor responses at a rate greater than stimuli not subject to the addition of distinctive response-produced cues. In addition to consideration of the facilitation of discriminative learning tasks, due to enrichment, investigators have been concerned with more direct measures of perceptual gain. For example, Arnoult (1953) measured discriminated performance following enrichment and Ellis, Bessemer, Devine and Trafton (1962) investigated the effects of enrichment on recognition performance.
Degree Name
Psychology
Level of Degree
Masters
Department Name
Psychology
First Committee Member (Chair)
Henry Carleton Ellis
Second Committee Member
John Marshall Rhodes
Third Committee Member
Sidney Rosenblum
Language
English
Document Type
Thesis
Recommended Citation
Homan, Larry E.. "Stimulus Coding Ability and Stimulus Predifferentiation." (1966). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/psy_etds/395