"Comparing Costs and Predictors of Low-Value Healthcare Service Use Amo" by Sara B. Nugent
 

Nursing ETDs

Publication Date

Fall 9-23-2024

Abstract

Low-value healthcare services (LVHSs) are unsupported by current evidence, associated with harmful patient outcomes, and equate to over $100 billion in wasteful spending annually. The aims of this descriptive, comparative study were to establish baseline prevalence and costs associated with LVHS use among primary care nurse practitioners (NPs), and to test the influence of different geographical regions and patient populations. A secondary data analysis of the Merative™ MarketScan® 2021 databases was conducted. LVHS prevalence was lower or fairly equal to that of other studies, and direct claim costs were very-low cost. Extremely high low-value lumbar radiographic imaging claim costs were found in Nevada, New Mexico, and rural areas. Urban practice location, female beneficiary gender, and younger beneficiary age were not significantly associated with more LVHSs used. Results from this study can be used to track LVHS prescribing trends among NPs and make comparisons across different patient and NP populations.

Degree Name

Nursing

Level of Degree

Doctoral

Department Name

College of Nursing

First Committee Member (Chair)

Barbara Incardona C. Holmes Damron, PhD, RN, FAAN

Second Committee Member

Roberta P. Lavin, PhD, RN, FAAN

Third Committee Member

Jongwon Lee, PhD, RN

Fourth Committee Member

Brady P. Horn, PhD

Keywords

Value-based care, low-value care, healthcare delivery, rural healthcare

Language

English

Document Type

Dissertation

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 1
    • Downloads: 1
  • Mentions
    • News Mentions: 1
see details

Share

COinS