A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Post-Retraction Citation

Authors

• Jodi Schneider, University of Wisconsin - Madison
• Will White, University of New Mexico
• Caitlin Bakker, University of Regina
• Susmita Das
• Yuanxi Fu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
• Esther Hsiao, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
• Jess Rogovin, Mayo Clinic

Presentation Date

5-2026

Files

Description

This scoping review examines post-retraction citations as a proxy for epistemic risk (i.e., the likelihood that one holds a false or inaccurate belief). It aims to describe the current landscape of empirical research on post-retraction citation, with the specific aim of determining the extent of epistemic risk and describing how that risk may manifest and result in epistemic harm.

Document Type

Presentation

Conference/Presentation Location

2026 World Conference on Research Integrity, Vancouver, BC

Keywords

research integrity, scoping review, retraction, citation

Disciplines

Health Sciences and Medical Librarianship

Recommended Citation

Schneider, Jodi; Will White; Caitlin Bakker; Susmita Das; Yuanxi Fu; Esther Hsiao; and Jess Rogovin. "A Scoping Review of Empirical Research on Post-Retraction Citation." (2026). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hslic-posters-presentations/227