Authors

Julia M L Brotherton, VCS Population Health, VCS Foundation, Level 6, 176 Wellington Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton 3053, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: jbrother@vcs.org.au.
Cosette Wheeler, Department of Pathology and Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Gary M. Clifford, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon, Cedex 08, France
Miriam Elfström, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 8, 8th floor, 141 52 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
Marion Saville, VCS Population Health, VCS Foundation, Level 6, 176 Wellington Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia; University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Grattan St & Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
John Kaldor, 6 Kirby Institute, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
Dorothy A. Machalek, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton 3053, Victoria, Australia; Kirby Institute, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, University of New South Wales, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; Centre for Women's Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Grattan St & Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-1-2021

Abstract

In order to achieve the global elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem, close surveillance of progress in public health and clinical activities and outcomes across the three pillars of vaccination, screening and treatment will be required. Surveillance should ideally occur within an integrated system that is planned, funded, and regularly evaluated to ensure it is providing timely, accurate and relevant feedback for action. In this paper, we conceptualise the main public health surveillance objectives as process and outcome measures in each of the three pillars. Process measures include coverage/participation measures for vaccination, screening and treatment alongside the ongoing assessment of the quality and reach of these programs and activities. Outcome measures related to the natural history of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection include HPV infection prevalence, precursor cervical lesions and cervical cancers (including stage at diagnosis, cancer incidence and mortality). These outcome measures can be used for monitoring the effectiveness of the three core activities in the short, medium and long term to assess whether these interventions are effectively reducing their occurrence. We discuss possible methods for the surveillance of these measures in the context of country capacity, drawing from examples in Australia, the USA and in low and middle income countries.

Share

COinS