Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences ETDs
Publication Date
5-4-1967
Abstract
Chapter I
THE PROBLEM AND DEFINATIONS OF TERMS USED
For many years the coach in the public school system has had to face the problem of pre-season blisters. This problem takes away valuable conditioning and skill development time from the athlete and also presents a problem to the coach-in his effort to build a well-conditioned team to represent the school.
I. THE PROBLEM
Statement of the problem. It is the purpose of this study to examine the hypothesis that there is no significant difference among four methods for the prevention of blisters: (1) two pairs of me ·um weight socks; (2) two pairs of socks, one light weight, one heavy weight; (3) tuf-skin and powder; and (4) vaseline.
Importance of the scudy. The scientific answer to the problem of prevention of blisters has not been formulated. This study can be a starting point from which answers may be sought for the prevention of blisters. Many references exemplify, cite, or deal with the causes and prevention of blisters, but all lack scientific evidence to support their contentions. This study sheds scientific light on the problem of preventing blisters. With the results of this study the coach will be able to choose the method of preventing blisters which will best fit his program with the least expenditure of time and money.
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Physical Education, Sports and Exercise Science
Level of Degree
Masters
Department Name
Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences
First Committee Member (Chair)
Lloyd Robert Burley
Second Committee Member
Lorain Frederick Diehm
Third Committee Member
Woodrow Wilson Clements
Recommended Citation
Frank, Terry Edward. "A Discriminative Study Of Four Methods Of Preventing Blisters.." (1967). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educ_hess_etds/159