Art & Art History ETDs
Publication Date
5-3-1967
Abstract
The aims and objectives of art education as an educational discipline have been discussed and argued since the formation of the Committee in Drawing by the National Education Association in 1899 (Lanier, 1964, p. 31). The situation is no better today than it was then. At a seminar in art education for research and curriculum development held at the Pennsylvania State University in the Summer of 1966, the leading minds in the fields of art education, psychology, research, the fine arts, art criticism, and education in general, met to discuss the current status of art education. In a summary statement of the seminar, project director, Edward Mattil (1966, p. 425) pointed out the general condition of the problem in art education today:
Each day brought the participants closer to some common understanding, but each day also pointed out the need for greater precision in the language, definition of concepts, and the inconsistencies in the stated goals of art education. The need to come to some general· agreement on the goals of art education is apparent.
Language
English
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Art Education
Level of Degree
Masters
Department Name
UNM Department of Art and Art History
First Committee Member (Chair)
Alexander Simeon Masley
Second Committee Member
Tom Wiley
Third Committee Member
Carl Erich Paak
Recommended Citation
Srubek, James J.. "The Effect of Two Art Product Evaluative Systems Upon Aesthetic Design Sensitivity and Personal Art Attitude." (1967). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/arth_etds/200