Architecture and Planning ETDs

Oran R. Woody

Publication Date

10-14-1975

Abstract

This paper presents the case for increased use of subterranean space. It does so by creating an awareness among architects and other design professionals that there are benefits to be found by underground designs that are unique to the concept. Secondly, it gives those professionals a base of knowledge in subterranean use that, when combined with their professional expertise, will give them a solid base from which to advocate subterranean architecture. In order to achieve the above goal, this paper has been divided into historical precedents, current examples, terminology and definitions, functional classifications, conceptual theories, subterranean structures and energy conservation, soils and their physical characteristics, social, legal, and code restrictions, and design examples. Each area of information has the function of enlightening the architect about one specific facet within the subterranean concept. The conclusion of this paper is that in spite of the benefits of underground use in energy conservation, architects continue to neglect a potentially valuable resource. They do so because of prejudice rather than because of any real deterrents to its use. Finally, it concludes with the supposition that as energy savings become more critical, subterranean design styles will become a more valid and acceptable form of architectural expression.

Language

English

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Architecture

Level of Degree

Masters

Department Name

School of Architecture and Planning

First Committee Member (Chair)

Robert Carl Cohlmeyer

Second Committee Member

Illegible

Third Committee Member

Van Dorn Hooker

Download

Included in

Architecture Commons

Share

COinS