Abstract
Understanding jurisdiction is paramount to deciding whether federal, state, or tribal courts can exercise jurisdiction for crimes committed in Indian country. The evolution of federal Indian law has created a legal landscape that is far from consistent. For the Indian law practitioner, it is important to stay abreast of the latest case law available to understand where proper jurisdiction lies. The latest cases of McGirt v. Oklahoma and United States v. Cooley are the newest case law available that demonstrate the Supreme Court’s reasoning and analysis in determining proper jurisdiction.
Recommended Citation
Jansen, Prof. Dustin. "The Role of United States v. Cooley and McGirt v. Oklahoma in Determining Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country." Tribal Law Journal 22, (2023). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/tlj/vol22/iss/3
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons, Jurisdiction Commons