Speech and Hearing Sciences ETDs
Publication Date
12-31-2020
Abstract
Currently there is a gap in the literature in understanding the relationship between the newly categorized primary outcome measure of discourse and secondary outcomes related to psychosocial impact, such as participation, psychological impact, social well-being, or mood. In a large sample of persons with stroke-induced aphasia (N=115), this study analyzed discourse samples using main concept analysis to determine how discourse performance correlates with the secondary outcome measures ALA, CCRSA, GDS, and CIQ. As a secondary research question, the differences in these relationships dependent on severity was also explored. Results showed statistically significant positive correlations between main concepts (MCs) and ALA (overall), CCRSA, and CIQ (overall), with effect sizes ranging from weak to moderate strength. This study provides novel insights into the relationship between the newly categorized primary outcome measure of discourse and secondary outcomes related to psychosocial impact.
Degree Name
Speech-Language Pathology
Level of Degree
Masters
Department Name
Speech and Hearing Sciences
First Committee Member (Chair)
Jessica D. Richardson, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
Second Committee Member
Rick Arenas, Ph.D.
Third Committee Member
Lori Nelson, M.S., CCC-SLP
Language
English
Keywords
aphasia, discourse, assessment, psychosocial outcomes, participation
Document Type
Thesis
Recommended Citation
Armes, Eileen; Jessica Richardson; Rick Arenas; and Lori Nelson. "The Relationship between Narrative Informativeness and Psychosocial Outcomes in Chronic Stroke-Induced Aphasia." (2020). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/shs_etds/26