Psychology ETDs
Publication Date
Spring 5-19-2021
Abstract
This study sought to determine whether individuals suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect are prone to misassessing their performance due to underlying personality and cognitive characteristics. To test this hypothesis, we first collected theory-informed measures of cognitive and personality traits. Next, we used three different performance estimate measures to assess the degree to which participants misestimated their abilities across two performance tasks (e.g., English grammar and logical reasoning). We found that some individuals are more prone to misassessing their performance and self-reported general Metacognitive Ability, Openness to Experience from the Big-Five personality Inventory, and an External Locus of Control orientation can play a role in this misestimation. In addition, individuals are most likely to misassess their performance when comparing themselves to others or when evaluating their performance at the item-level than when assessing how many questions they will answer correctly.
Degree Name
Psychology
Level of Degree
Masters
Department Name
Psychology
First Committee Member (Chair)
Dr. Eric Ruthruff
Second Committee Member
Dr. Tania Reynolds
Third Committee Member
Dr. Ann Speed
Language
English
Keywords
Dunning-Kruger effect, Overconfidence bias, Individual Differences, Personality Factors
Document Type
Thesis
Recommended Citation
Sanchez, Danielle N.. "Are Only the Unskilled Overconfident? Deconstructing the Dunning-Kruger Effect Through an Individual Differences Approach." (2021). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/psy_etds/337