Political Science ETDs
Publication Date
Summer 7-15-2020
Abstract
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) cemented itself as one of the most controversial pieces of legislation of the decade. Public opinion polls find Americans are often evenly split in support of the ACA. This dissertation explores the roles of self-interest, group identity, and racial resentment on attitudes toward the ACA and healthcare reform. The dissertation centers our attention on variation by race and the impact racial tensions beyond the Black-White paradigm on these attitudes. I find group identity shapes attitudes Blacks’ and Latinos’ attitudes toward the ACA but not Whites’ and racial resentment, directed toward Blacks, Latinos and Immigrants, plays a strong role when people evaluate the ACA but not when they consider healthcare reform broadly. The landscape of healthcare reform is constantly shifting. Having an accurate pulse on attitudes toward healthcare reform is essential to ensuring the system is responding to citizens needs and expectations.
Degree Name
Political Science
Level of Degree
Doctoral
Department Name
Political Science
First Committee Member (Chair)
Gabriel R. Sanchez
Second Committee Member
Michael Rocca
Third Committee Member
Jessica Feezell
Fourth Committee Member
Francisco Pedraza
Language
English
Keywords
Affordable Care Act, Healthcare Reform, Public Opinion, Racial Resentment, Linked Fate, Cross-Racial Linked Fate
Document Type
Dissertation
Recommended Citation
Livaudais, Maria Beatrice. "UNDERSTANDING ATTITUDES TOWARD HEALTHCARE REFORM: THE ROLES OF SELF-INTEREST, GROUP IDENTITY AND RACIAL RESENTMENT." (2020). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/pols_etds/99
Included in
American Politics Commons, Health Policy Commons, Public Health Commons, Public Policy Commons