Pharmaceutical Sciences ETDs
Publication Date
Summer 5-31-2024
Abstract
This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of office-based versus telehealth delivery of buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). A retrospective chart review of 135 patients at the University of New Mexico Hospital's Addiction and Substance Abuse Program compared retention rates and costs between the two settings. Retention was defined as continuous treatment for at least six months. No statistically significant difference in retention rates was found, with 51% for office-based and 42% for telehealth. However, office-based treatment had higher total costs, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3,750 per 1% increase in retention. The findings suggest telehealth is a cost-effective alternative, particularly valuable during public health crises. Future research should investigate long-term outcomes and the integration of telehealth into standard practice to optimize treatment accessibility and resource allocation.
Fourth Committee Member
Julie Salvador, PhD
First Committee Member (Chair)
Matthew Borrego, RPh, PhD
Degree Name
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Second Committee Member
Melissa Roberts, PhD
Level of Degree
Masters
Third Committee Member
Snehal Bhatt, MD
Department Name
College of Pharmacy
Language
English
Document Type
Thesis
Keywords
opioid use disorder, telehealth, office-based treatment, cost-effectiveness, retention rates, buprenorphine treatment.
Recommended Citation
Alkhafaji, Rana. "A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF TELEHEALTH VS. OFFICE-BASED DELIVERY OF BUPRENORPHINE AT THE ADDICTION AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM (ASAP) CLINIC - UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITAL: A SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE." (2024). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/phrm_etds/36
Included in
Health Economics Commons, Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Commons, Psychiatric and Mental Health Commons, Substance Abuse and Addiction Commons