Philosophy ETDs

Publication Date

Spring 5-7-2018

Abstract

This thesis argues that images are necessary for thinking. If this is true then the nature of images needs to be understood. The problem with many accounts of perception is assuming that representing what we see is a matter of accurate depiction. The problem is solved by attending to the skills of visual discernment rather than judgments about those perceptions. My approach is both historical and analytic. Aristotle, Hume, and Wittgenstein give accounts of perception which are critically discussed. The notion that an image is a copy is rejected by showing how complicated and indeterminate that relation is. Images have a content that is not representational. Then we must have access to how perceptions are formed before subjecting them to judgments of truth or accuracy.

The implication for a theory of perception is that understanding how images are formed and used is prior to any claim of veracity.

Degree Name

Philosophy

Level of Degree

Masters

Department Name

Philosophy

First Committee Member (Chair)

Paul Livingston

Second Committee Member

Adrian Johnston

Third Committee Member

Ann Murphy

Language

English

Keywords

images, thought, representation, perception, Hume, painting

Document Type

Thesis

Download

Share

COinS