Public Administration ETDs

Publication Date

5-11-1973

Abstract

This study is an attempt to analyze the promotional processes now in use in a comparative sample of police departments and to suggest measures which might be taken to improve promotional systems. The available literature on the subject is also reviewed. The various factors commonly used in making judgments as to promotions are surveyed. Among these are written examinations, oral examinations, performance evaluations, seniority, and in-service education and training. The writer found little uniformity as between departments in the way in which the various factors were weighted. An analysis of the literature revealed that written examinations were almost always used, but to be effective, care must be given to see that the examinations are properly constructed and should contain material pertinent to all phases of the policeman's job. Oral interviews can be very helpful in revealing the more subtle aspects of the supervisory position but care must be taken in the selection of the interviewers and in the selection of appropriate material to be covered. Performance ratings can also be used but extreme care must be exercised to eliminate bias. Various techniques for accomplishing this are suggested. Seniority as a criterion for promotion is analyzed and, except in cases of ties between individuals, is ruled out as a promotional technique. It is felt that seniority in itself can be a hindrance rather than a help in allowing a department to promote those persons who are most aware of changing needs. Finally, the problem of requiring formal education on an in-service basis as a condition for promotion is examined. It was found that, while, in the past, little attention was given to in-service education and training, more departments and almost all authorities are giving formal education increasing weight in promotions. The education incentive system used by police departments is examined and in particular that used in Albuquerque. The study concludes that much more study and consideration be given to promotional processes if the ultimate aim of more professional law enforcement is to be attained.

Degree Name

Public Administration

Level of Degree

Masters

Department Name

School of Public Administration

First Committee Member (Chair)

Edwin Francis Connerley

Second Committee Member

Donald Winston Smithburg

Third Committee Member

Albert H. Rosenthal

Language

English

Document Type

Thesis

Download

Share

COinS