COMMENTS ON THE PAPER “AN ALTERNATIVE COMBINATION RULE FOR EVIDENTIAL REASONING” BY SEBBAK et al., PUBLISHED IN FUSION 2014 CONFERENCE, SALAMANCA, SPAIN, JULY 2014

Authors

Florentin Smarandache, University of New MexicoFollow
Jean DezertFollow
Arnaud Martin

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2014

Abstract

In this note we want to show that the PCR6 fusion rule works and redistributes the conflicting mass properly, contrarily to the authors’ assertion that “the focal element {v3} absorbs almost all of the conflicting mass (the majority).” We also question the validity of the new CREC rule of combination presented by the authors.

Publication Title

Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences

Volume

33E

Issue

2

First Page

91

Last Page

94

Language (ISO)

English

Keywords

Belief function; PCR6 rule; PCR5 rule; CREC rule

Recommended Citation

Smarandache, Florentin; Jean Dezert; and Arnaud Martin. "COMMENTS ON THE PAPER “AN ALTERNATIVE COMBINATION RULE FOR EVIDENTIAL REASONING” BY SEBBAK et al., PUBLISHED IN FUSION 2014 CONFERENCE, SALAMANCA, SPAIN, JULY 2014." Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences , 2 (2014): 91-94. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/math_fsp/392

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.