Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-2020
Abstract
The right to sue and defend in the courts of the several states are essential privileges of citizenship. Eight generations ago, this right was unavailable to black people, because descendants of African slaves were never intended to be citizens. Then, and for years to come, local governments failed to protect African Americans from violence and discrimination and were sometimes complicit in those violations.
Qualified immunity was born in 1982 when the Supreme Court decided Harlow v. Fitzgerald. With an outflow of questionable court decisions shielding officers solely because they act under color of state law, it is time for the Supreme Court to reconsider the path that qualified immunity has created. Only then, can the original purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be arguably vindicated.
Publication Title
Journal of the Kansas Trial Lawyers Association
Volume
29
First Page
29
Last Page
32
Keywords
Monroe v. Pape, Pearson v. Callahan, Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, Harlow v. Fitzgerald, Pierson v. Ray, Myers v. Anderson
Recommended Citation
Joseph A. Schremmer & Sean M. McGivern,
Is it Time to Revisit Qualified Immunity?,
29
Journal of the Kansas Trial Lawyers Association
29
(2020).
Available at:
https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/857
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Election Law Commons, Law and Race Commons