Document Type
Report
Publication Date
10-18-2019
Abstract
The is a Comment on the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Proposed Rule: FR-6111-P-02 HUD’s Implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s Disparate Impact Standard . This comment examines how algorithms in housing applications may be inherently biased against certain groups of people.
Their arguments against the proposed legislation:
1. To ensure that an algorithm does not have disparate impact, it is not enough to show that individual input factors are not “substitutes or close proxies” for protected characteristics.
2. It is impossible to audit an algorithm for bias without an adequate level of transparency or access to the algorithm.
3. Allowing defendants to deflect responsibility to proprietary third-party algorithms effectively destroys disparate impact liability.
4. The proposed regulation fails to take into account the cumulative impact of multiple users of algorithms that result in disparate impact on protected classes where no individual user has liability under the proposed regulation.
TO VIEW OR LEAVE COMMENTS VISIT THE FEDERAL REGISTER
Publication Title
Federal Register (Regulations.Gov)
First Page
7 pages
Keywords
Civil Rights, Fair Housing, Individuals with Disabilities, Mortgages, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
Recommended Citation
Sonia Gipson Rankin, Alfred Mathewson, Melanie Moses, G. Matthew Fricke, Kathy Powers, Gabriel R. Sanchez, Christopher Moore, Elizabeth Bradley, Mirta Galesic & Joshua Garland,
Regarding Docket No. FR-6111-P-02, HUD’s Implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s Disparate Impact Standard,
Federal Register (Regulations.Gov)
7 pages
(2019).
Available at:
https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/771
News, University of New Mexico
2019_HUD_NEWS_SantaFe.pdf (55 kB)
News, Santa Fe Institute
2019_HUD_forbes.pdf (203 kB)
News, Forbes
Comments
Docket ID: HUD-2019-0067-2823