Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-2010

Abstract

The paper addresses the basic rules of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rule 702 under both federal and New Mexico law. The paper attempts to distill in summary form the essential principles of the Alberico scientific validity analysis. The focus is on the validity analysis because of its centrality to the admissibility of scientific opinion evidence. Third, it examines the two recent New Mexico decisions that further explain important issues relating to expert opinion evidence.

Publication Title

The New Mexico Trial Lawyer: The Journal of the New Mexico Trial Lawyers' Foundation

Volume

41

Issue

1

First Page

8 pages

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.