Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-2010
Abstract
The paper addresses the basic rules of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rule 702 under both federal and New Mexico law. The paper attempts to distill in summary form the essential principles of the Alberico scientific validity analysis. The focus is on the validity analysis because of its centrality to the admissibility of scientific opinion evidence. Third, it examines the two recent New Mexico decisions that further explain important issues relating to expert opinion evidence.
Publication Title
The New Mexico Trial Lawyer: The Journal of the New Mexico Trial Lawyers' Foundation
Volume
41
Issue
1
First Page
8 pages
Recommended Citation
David J. Stout,
Judicial Evaluation of Expert Opinions: Recent Developments,
41
The New Mexico Trial Lawyer: The Journal of the New Mexico Trial Lawyers' Foundation
8 pages
(2010).
Available at:
https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/604