Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Spring 7-1-2013
Abstract
In Strickland v. Washington, the Court issued a standard for determining when defense counsel's ineffective performance, through no direct fault of the prosecution, law enforcement, public, or judiciary, undermined the fairness of a trial such that a conviction or sentence had to be rendered as a violation of due process. The article's conclusion presents a model for applying the legal history underlying Strickland to ineffective assistance cases.
Publication Title
Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Volume
14
Issue
2
First Page
215
Last Page
392
Recommended Citation
Joshua E. Kastenberg,
Nearing Thirty Years: The Burger Court, Strickland v. Washington, and the Parameters of the Right to Counsel,
14
Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
215
(2013).
Available at:
https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/438