Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-1999

Abstract

In her seminal 1951 work The Origins of Totalitarianism, the political philosopher Hannah Arendt examined historical developments in Europe during the period between the two World Wars and declared that "the transformation of the state from an instrument of the law into an instrument of the nation had been completed." While Arendt focused on threats to individual and minority rights posed by the repressive "nation-state," her critique also identified the complicity of an international legal system that accorded undue deference to sovereign prerogative. The collapse of the League of Nations, the ascendancy of the Nazi Party in Germany, and the ravages of the Holocaust in the 1930s and 1940s graphically demonstrate the legal, political and human costs of totalitarian nationalism. Within this historical framework, the brutal tendencies of fascism are exposed: the totalitarian state dedicates its leadership, its institutions, and particularly its security forces to the annihilation of those who do not belong to the "nation." But is fascism, conceived as state-centered ultra-nationalism, the ultimate threat to human rights, or are non-state sponsored abuses of human dignity of comparable concern?

Publication Title

Columbia Human Rights Law Review

Volume

31

First Page

81

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.