Special Education ETDs
Publication Date
Spring 4-2-2024
Abstract
Because writing is complex and draws upon so many psychological and cognitive processes, learning to write is even more challenging for students with disabilities than it is for typically developing students. Nonetheless, writing research in the field of education and special education lags behind that of many other academic subjects. The body of research that does exist, indicates that affective factors (attitude toward writing, evaluation of self as writer, enjoyment of writing) impacts students’ writing achievement. This paper proposes a multiple baseline across settings study to determine whether including a response journal element as part of classroom writing assessment writing affects attitude toward writing of students with disabilities. The project follows from understanding the unique cognitive characteristics of adolescents as well as current theories of writing development and writing assessment. Results indicated that the dialogue journals reflected and supported participants’ cognitive development, and increased their confidence, self-efficacy and self-image as writers as well as their motivation to continue to improve their writing. Implications for research include confirming previous research and filling a gap in the research with a successful strategy for improving adolescent writing.
Keywords
Assessment, Writing Assessment, Special Education, General Education, Inclusive Practices
Document Type
Dissertation
Language
English
Degree Name
Special Education
Level of Degree
Doctoral
First Committee Member (Chair)
Margo Collier
Second Committee Member
Sunaina Shenoy
Third Committee Member
Allison Nanneman
Fourth Committee Member
Mary Rice
Recommended Citation
Ovitt, Brigid Elise. "Dialogue Journals in Assessment of Student Writing." (2024). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educ_spcd_etds/102