Biology Faculty & Staff Publications
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2002
Abstract
There have been many attempts to document links between reproductive allocation and factors such as adult body size and demography. This paper suggests that among closely related taxa, two dimensionless numbers, each a benefit—cost ratio summarizing reproductive timing, allocation and demography, are invariants and thus are useful to classify life histories. The two numbers are E/α and C·E, where E is average adult life span,α is age-at-first-reproduction and C is average mass (per adult) devoted to reproduction per unit of time, divided by the average adult body mass (m); C is usually called reproductive effort'. Since E−1 is the average adult mortality rate, C/E−1 is the reproductive effort (benefit) per unit death (cost). Similarly, E/α is the amount of time for reproduction (E) divided by the time cost to get there (α). Combining these two numbers with the relative size (I) of an offspring (I/m) yields a new classification scheme for life histories; this is contrasted with other classification schemes (e.g. r and K).
Publisher
Evolutionary Ecology Research
Volume
4
First Page
749
Last Page
758
Language (ISO)
English
Keywords
life history classification, dimensionless numbers, life-history cube, r and K selection, Smith-Fretwell
Recommended Citation
Charnov, E.L. 2002. Reproductive effort, offspring size and benefit/cost ratios in the classification of life histories. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:749-758