Publication Date
Winter 11-15-2019
Abstract
This dissertation explores the revalorization of Italian extra virgin olive oils after a food scare that revealed some oils to be inauthentic or adulterated. In the process of distinguishing products, producers and tasters looked toward terroir or the “taste of place” as proof of their declarations of authenticity and as a method for differentiating oils. However, in this attempt, they engaged with other pervasive tropes of difference including those that intersected with belonging, the local and global, and race. This dissertation argues that terroir is a material-semiotic object; that while it may be grounded in the materiality of oils is chiefly produced through the discursive practices of identification and description. This conception of terroir breaks down categories of authenticity and quality as equally discursively produced, and allows for observing the ways personal taste experiences are connected to broader politics through the (re)production of axes of differentiation across scales and domains.
Keywords
Italy, Tuscany, terroir, olive oil, sensory anthropology
Document Type
Dissertation
Language
English
Degree Name
Anthropology
Level of Degree
Doctoral
Department Name
Anthropology
First Committee Member (Chair)
Ronda Brulotte
Second Committee Member
Lindsay Smith
Third Committee Member
Erin Debenport
Fourth Committee Member
Michael Di Giovine
Recommended Citation
Shattuck, Daniel Gene II. "AMARO E PICCANTE: THE PRODUCTION AND USE OF TERROIR IN THE SCANDAL OF ITALIAN EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OILS." (2019). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/anth_etds/182