Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
Abstract
More reinforced concrete supertall and megatall high-rise structures are being built due to the growing global demand for high-rise buildings, recent advancements in concrete technology, and improvements in construction techniques. When using concrete in these structures, additional care must be taken. Evaluating Super High-Rise Concrete Structures using various criteria is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) challenge. We propose an MCDM method with a set of criteria and alternatives. The Root Assessment Method (RAM) is applied in this study to rank the alternatives. The RAM method is integrated with plithogenic sets to handle uncertain information. Plithogenic operators are used to combine the plithogenic numbers into a single matrix. Seven criteria and nine alternatives are evaluated in this study. The results indicate that the Structural Strength and Stability criterion has the highest weight, while the Non-Structural Component Performance criterion has the lowest weight. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with different criteria weights to observe variations in the rankings of alternatives. The results demonstrate that the rankings of alternatives remain stable under varying weights.
Recommended Citation
Xing, Kaifeng; Xiaoping Wang; and Peng Chen. "Robust Seismic Performance Evaluation of Super High-Rise Concrete Structures Using MCDM and Plithogenic-RAM Approach." Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 80, 1 (2025). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol80/iss1/14
