•  
  •  
 

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems

Abstract

This study proposed a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology for evaluating the Dual-Qualified" Teachers Quality. This evaluation has various criteria and factors. So, the MCDM can deal with these factors. This study combines the MCDM methodology with the plithogenic set to deal with uncertainty and vague information. Three experts are invited to evaluate the criteria and alternatives. Then we replace their opinions by using plithogenic numbers. We used plithogenic operators to combine these numbers. Eight criteria and eleven alternatives are used in this study. We used the TOPSIS method under the plithogenic numbers to rank the alternatives. the results show the Professional Knowledge and Industry Expertise criterion has the highest weights and Research and Innovation in Teaching criterion has the lowest weights. We validated the proposed methodology by an application. The results show the proposed methodology is effective.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.