•  
  •  
 

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems

Abstract

This study proposed an uncertainty framework for evaluation of Integrated Preschool with School in Rural and Remote Communities. This evaluation has various criteria so, we used the concept of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). There are various MCDM methods to deal with decision making problems. We used the COPRAS method to rank the alternatives. COPRAS is a MCDM method dealing with various criteria and alternatives. This study used the Plithogenic sets to deal with uncertainty and vague information. Three experts are invited to evaluate the criteria and alternatives. Case study with an empirical example with nine criteria and nine alternatives is conducted. The results show the Accessibility and Enrollment Rates criterion has the highest rate and the criterion Financial and Resource Management has the lowest rate. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the different criteria weights and rank of alternatives.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.