Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
Abstract
The study addresses a crucial challenge in the analysis of rights violations by applying neutrosophic methods. Specifically, it investigates how multi-criteria assessment tools can provide a more precise and nuanced approach to addressing rights violations, a topic that remains of global relevance, given the complexity and diversity of situations that occur in different contexts. The existing literature, although abundant in human rights studies, of-ten lacks approaches that integrate the uncertainty and ambiguity inherent in these cases, limiting the effective-ness of conventional analyses. This work fills that gap by implementing a neutrosophic approach that captures these dynamics more effectively and adequately. Using the neutrosophic-based multi-criteria assessment meth-odology, the study employs advanced techniques to manage and model the indeterminacy present in human rights violations. The analysis undertaken reveals that this approach allows for a more complete and robust as-sessment of the circumstances of rights violations, by integrating the divergent perceptions of the experts and ac-tors involved. The findings underline how this approach improves decision-making in scenarios where situa-tions are not entirely clear or definitive. The study's contribution lies in offering a more precise and practically applicable methodology for human rights assessment, allowing for a more nuanced and reliable analysis that can influence policies and corrective actions at a global level.
Recommended Citation
Montenegro Altamirano, Vanessa Lisseth; Jaime Rodrigo Cadena Morillo; Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita; and Ricardo Sánchez Casanova. "Application of Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tech-niques for Assessing Violations of Child Support Rights." Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 74, 1 (2024). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol74/iss1/37
