Neutrosophic Sets and Systems
Abstract
Smarandache extended the concept of falsifiability to include hypotheses that involve multiple values. Smarandache's extension of classical logic introduces Partial Falsifiability within multi-valued logic, which allows for the inclusion of partial truth values, uncertainties, and false values, unlike traditional falsifiability which only classifies hypotheses as completely true or false. Using this approach this study investigates specifically the concept of interdisciplinarity in the field of integral general medicine, with a specific emphasis on the integration of nursing procedures. The method employs sentiment analysis of scientific questions using the Consensus tool and plithogenic statistics to assess complex hypotheses. The findings indicate that the combination of nursing procedures and interprofessional approaches greatly improves teamwork, communication, and clinical competence. The results suggest a high probability of truth (0.67), some indeterminacy (0.33), and a low probability of falsity (0.17). Future research will focus on utilizing alternative sentiment analysis tools and incorporating the concept of fallibility into hypotheses using Smarandache's multivalued logic in different contexts.
Recommended Citation
De la Cantera, Dolores Hernandez; Rosangela Caicedo Quiroz; Mairim Lago Queija; Jeanntte Rodriguez Gonzalez; and Maikel Y. Leyva Vazquez. "Analyzing Interdisciplinary Education in General Medicine Using Smarandache's Multivalued Logic Hypothesis Theory and Plithogenic Probability." Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 70, 1 (2024). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol70/iss1/23
