•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is one of the most crucial parts of the criminal justice system. Because of the nature of crimes and investigations, the government or its agents will sometimes intrude into attorney-client conversations. The Supreme Court last addressed the impact of these intrusions over fifty years ago in Weatherford v. Bursey. Unfortunately, the Court failed to address many of the issues surrounding these intrusions. This failure has led to a split amongst the circuit courts of appeal, with a resulting system of rules that is based on where the intrusion occurred. This situation is untenable in a modern age when crimes and investigations frequently cross jurisdictional boundaries. Both defendants and law enforcement officials are entitled to consistent rules. This Article analyzes relevant Sixth Amendment case law and concludes that fairness should be the guiding principle for rules about government intrusion into attorney-client conversations. This Article then proposes general rules based on fairness that should be established by the Supreme Court.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.