Publication Date



28 p. ; An outstanding student paper selected as a Honors Paper.


During recent years, courts and legislatures have expanded the legal rights of fetuses, which historically were treated as part of the woman carrying them. This expansion of fetal rights has often resulted in conflict between the rights of the fetus and the rights of the woman carrying it. While concern for the health of fetuses is important to the health of our society, the maternal-fetal conflict is often unnecessary, as the health interests of fetuses could be more effectively promoted in ways that would not conflict with the interests of the mother. In this paper I will specifically address whether civil commitment statutes should be used to prevent pregnant women from using drugs and alcohol during pregnancy. Because the use of civil commitment statutes for this purpose would exacerbate the maternal-fetal conflict, and fetal health could be better promoted in other ways, I conclude that they should not.


University of New Mexico School of Law

Document Type

Student Paper



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.