Document Type

Article

Publication Date

8-2012

Abstract

Whether fracking is an abnormally dangerous activity for purposes of strict liability appears to be an issue of first impression. That larger issue primarily turns on a smaller one: whether fracking accidents—or “fraccidents”—are avoidable or unavoidable. To that end, this Comment argues that when practiced with reasonable care and in the vicinity of other petroleum production, fraccidents are avoidable, and thus, fracking is not abnormally dangerous. Instead of strict liability, courts should combine a negligence standard with res ipsa loquitur to determine liability of fracking companies that contaminate water sources. First, this Comment will present background on the process and known environmental impact of fracking.Then it will survey the development and current laws of strict liability for abnormally dangerous activities, negligence, and res ipsa loquitur. The article will then apply the Second Restatement of Torts’ factors of strict liability to fracking. Finally, it concludes with recommendations for courts to apply res ipsa loquitur in fracking cases.

Publication Title

Kansas Law Review

Volume

60

First Page

1215

Last Page

1257

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.