Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2009

Abstract

To be sure, there are at least a few problems with the approach of drawing upon the Framers for guidance with respect to the issues of the day. First, the Framers did not reach consensus on all matters. The famous rivalry between the Alexander Hamilton, a staunch nationalist from New York who favored a strong federal banking system and central government, and Jefferson, a republican from Virginia who preferred an agrarian lifestyle and trusted the people to do right by American society, perhaps best illustrates the fact that the Framers themselves were not in lockstep as to the makeup of the American government. Second, the essence of the American constitutional design was not to provide definitive responses to all circumstances of American life, but rather set in motion a peaceful process by which those answers could be developed by way of democratic participation. The Constitution, historian Joseph Ellis noted, “did not resolve the long-standing political disagreements that existed,” but instead established a “context with which they could be argued out.” The Constitution, in short, did not offer substantive formalisms applicable to all situations, but rather supplied the procedural structure within which such answers could be formulated.

Publication Title

Journal of Internet Law

Volume

13

Issue

9

First Page

3

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.