Sociology ETDs

Publication Date

Spring 4-11-2025

Abstract

This dissertation examines how social and emotional factors influence attitudes toward science and decision making regarding science-based policy recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. I examine boundary work practices among the public as they evaluate experts during the pandemic and the social sources of information people used to construct knowledge. Then I examine the social and emotional factors that participants indicated influenced their own attitude formation and decisions to act regarding public health recommendations during the pandemic. I find that emotions influence each element of the decision process: information gathering, information evaluation, attitude formation, and decisions to act. Affective commitment and moral emotions are important for understanding decision processes and help explain divergences between attitudes and actions. This research provides implications for science and policy communication. Additionally, this research provides insights into democratic deliberation among the public and prospects for future discourse in civil society in a politically contentious environment.

Degree Name

Sociology

Level of Degree

Doctoral

Department Name

Sociology

First Committee Member (Chair)

Richard Wood

Second Committee Member

Sharon Erickson Nepstad

Third Committee Member

Owen Whooley

Fourth Committee Member

James M. Jasper

Keywords

emotions, decision making, science communication, boundary work, COVID-19

Language

English

Document Type

Dissertation

Download

Included in

Sociology Commons

Share

COinS