Quality Review of Computer Digital Media Art Design using Neutrosophic Logic: A Case Study

Authors

Gao Huijuan
Fu Licheng

Abstract

Evaluating the quality of Computer Digital Media Art Design is complex because it involves both subjective artistic elements and objective technical criteria. This study uses the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method to deal with different criteria. Two MCDM methods are used in this study such as Preference Selection Index (PSI) Method to compute the criteria weights and the RATGOS method to rank the alternatives. These methods are used neutrosophic sets to dela with vague and uncertainty information. Eight criteria and seven alternatives are used to select the best alternatives. Four experts have evaluated these criteria and alternatives. An example is conducted to show the validation of the proposed approach. The sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are applied in this study to show the stability of the ranks and the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Recommended Citation

Huijuan, Gao and Fu Licheng. "Quality Review of Computer Digital Media Art Design using Neutrosophic Logic: A Case Study." Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 81, 1 (2025). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol81/iss1/50