•  
  •  
 

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems

Abstract

This paper uses multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to evaluate the f inancial performance based on a set of business companies. This study proposed a decision-making methodology for computing the criteria weights and ranking the alternatives. The decision-making methodology is integrated with plithogenic sets to deal with uncertainty information. We collected seven criteria and eleven alternatives to be ranked. We used the WSM method under the plithogenic sets to rank the alternatives. The results show the Profitability criterion has the highest importance and the Market Valuation criterion has the lowest importance. In the ranking of alternatives, we show the alternative 11 has the highest ranking of alternatives and alternative 5 has the lowest ranking of alternatives. We compared our model with other MCDM methods. The results show that our model is effective compared to other MCDM methods.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.