Document Type

Article

Publication Date

Spring 7-1-2003

Abstract

This paper reviews the domestic and international law basis for the executive authority to determine combatant status, and analyzes the legality of contemporary practice. It also accepts, as a definition for unlawful combatants: "persons violating the traditional laws and customs of war." Unlawful combatants do not meet the traditional captured combatant (prisoner of war) protections embodied in the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (hereinafter Geneva Convention I). Part I of this paper examines the historic views of combatant status among sovereigns. It also addresses the evolutionary purpose of the law of armed conflict in designating combatants versus non-combatants. Part II discusses the origins and core philosophy (or theology) of modem religious-based terrorism. Part III analyzes the contemporary domestic practice of determining combatant status. Part IV reviews the United States' position in a comparative framework against the practices of other signatories to the Geneva Convention. Both Israeli and British determinations of combatant status are analyzed in this comparison. Finally, the paper concludes with the assessment that, to date, the current administration has correctly identified al-Qaeda members as unlawful combatants, not subject to the complete protection of the Geneva Convention III.

Publication Title

Gonzaga Law Review

Volume

39

Issue

3

First Page

495

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.